MENU
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Email [email protected]
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
donate now

Brighteon

  1. Home
  2. Brighteon

1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint 5.27.24

2. Brighteon – [DE 37] 9.27.24 Google Motion To Transfer

3. Brighteon – [DE 38] Fb Motion To Transfer 9.27.24

4. Brighteon – [DE 39] X Motion To Transfer 9.27.24

5. Brighteon – [DE 49] 10.28.24 Filed Response To Motions To Transfer

Social Media Freedom Foundation Corp. | Est. 2021