MENU
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Email [email protected]
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
donate now
March 24, 2024
Is Free Speech in Jeopardy? | Jason Fyk

Is Free Speech in Jeopardy? | Jason Fyk

Alec Flores 0
Grey Matter https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/grey-matter/id1618808923?i=1000650140770 https://greymatterleightongrey.podbean.com/e/is-free-speech-in-jeopardy-jason-fyk/
March 22, 2024
IS FACEBOOK IN BUSINESS WITH HACKERS?

IS FACEBOOK IN BUSINESS WITH HACKERS?

Alec Flores 0
https://rumble.com/v4jb90o-is-facebook-in-business-with-hackers.html
January 23, 2024
Podcast – Ryan Hartwig & Jason Fyk – The Social Media Gulag & The Free Speech Implications of Porn

Podcast – Ryan Hartwig & Jason Fyk – The Social Media Gulag & The Free Speech Implications of Porn

Alec Flores 0
Listen to the Full Podcast Here:https://thefreethoughtproject.com/podcast/podcast-ryan-hartwig-jason-fyk-the-social-media-gulag-the-free-speech-implications-of-porn
January 12, 2024
The case to END BIG TECH Censorship. Live Interview.

The case to END BIG TECH Censorship. Live Interview.

Alec Flores 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIys8WyVXzg&t=1s
December 26, 2023
David Clements live with Jason Fyk Case Update: Section 230 – Big Tech Censorship

David Clements live with Jason Fyk Case Update: Section 230 – Big Tech Censorship

Alec Flores 0
https://twitter.com/ApolloWatching/status/1739783727704953135
November 29, 2023
Real America’s Voice, Outside the Beltway John Fredericks Interviews Jason Fyk on Social Censorship

Real America’s Voice, Outside the Beltway John Fredericks Interviews Jason Fyk on Social Censorship

Alec Flores 0
https://twitter.com/jfradioshow/status/1729624187671625962 Read More And Support: https://www.johnfredericksradio.com/ and https://americasvoice.news/
July 21, 2023
Live With Jason Fyk | The Jeff Dornik Show

Live With Jason Fyk | The Jeff Dornik Show

Alec Flores 0
https://twitter.com/jeffdornik/status/1682450293072756736
May 20, 2023
OP-ED: Supreme Court just dropped the ball on internet regulation

OP-ED: Supreme Court just dropped the ball on internet regulation

Alec Flores 0
https://occupydemocrats.com/2023/05/20/op-ed-supreme-court/
April 20, 2023
Op-Ed: The Right to Free Speech on the Internet May Be Over

Op-Ed: The Right to Free Speech on the Internet May Be Over

Alec Flores 0
https://www.westernjournal.com/op-ed-right-free-speech-internet-may/
March 29, 2023
Jason Fyk reveals how the courts got Sec. 230 WRONG, unleashing decades of unlawful CENSORSHIP.

Jason Fyk reveals how the courts got Sec. 230 WRONG, unleashing decades of unlawful CENSORSHIP.

Alec Flores 0
Watch The Full Video Here

Posts navigation

1 2 3 … 8

Recent Posts

  • The END Of Censorship, SCOTUS Ruling Could END Section 230 Censorship Of Conservatives From Big Tech
  • Man VS Meta: Jason Fyk’s War for Free Speech and His Battle Against Meta
  • Laura Loomer Interviews Jason Fyk
  • Mel K & Jason Fyk | Government Censorship Cartel Exposes Itself | 1-16-25
  • EXCLUSIVE WITH TIM POOL:

Categories

  • Articles
  • Audio Discussions
  • Interviews
  • Podcast
  • Section 230
  • Twitter Spaces
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

“Freedom of expression does not end where the internet begins.”
– Social Media Freedom Foundation 

• Home • Posts  • Articles • Interviews • Filings

• About Us • Members • Donate

• Contact • Media Inquiries • Submit Your Story

Social Media Freedom Foundation Corp. Is a 501c3 Non Profit | Est. 2021
Privacy Policy