MENU
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Email [email protected]
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
donate now
September 14, 2022
US Government Scrambling to Dodge First Constitutional Challenge of Section 230

US Government Scrambling to Dodge First Constitutional Challenge of Section 230

Alec Flores 0
https://humanevents.com/2022/09/14/us-government-scrambling-to-dodge-first-constitutional-challenge-of-section-230
September 9, 2022
Private or State Action? – Section 230’s Achilles’ Heel

Private or State Action? – Section 230’s Achilles’ Heel

Alec Flores 0
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/private-state-action-section-230s-achilles-heel/ This article argues that Section 230’s protections for online platforms may be overextended, particularly when companies act ...
September 3, 2022
How Widespread Is Big Tech Censorship?

How Widespread Is Big Tech Censorship?

Alec Flores 0
https://twitter.com/capitolreport/status/1566060791790555137?t=uUp1DOb1u3IU12baXcD3DA&s=19
June 27, 2022
Jason Fyk – “Why I’m suing Facebook and the US Government.” Blood Money – Episode 16

Jason Fyk – “Why I’m suing Facebook and the US Government.” Blood Money – Episode 16

Alec Flores 0
https://rumble.com/embed/v17kt2u/?pub=4 The following podcast is available for Audio only download off of Spotify, I heart Radio, Amazon music, ...
May 22, 2022
Mel K Welcomes Section 230 Warrior Jason Fyk On Fighting Censorship For We The People

Mel K Welcomes Section 230 Warrior Jason Fyk On Fighting Censorship For We The People

Alec Flores 0
https://themelkshow.com/mel-k-welcomes-section-230-warrior-jason-fyk-on-fighting-censorship-for-we-the-people-5-22-22/
May 22, 2022
Section 230 Heading For Supreme Court? Jason Fyk & Rep Louie Gohmert Have The Case

Section 230 Heading For Supreme Court? Jason Fyk & Rep Louie Gohmert Have The Case

Alec Flores 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxO0yRRKjBQ Rep Gohmert (R-TX-1) calls Section 230 "An Abomination Against All Americans" - The regulated have become the ...
May 1, 2022
Jason Fyk Joins To Discuss His Case Against Section 230 and The Federal Government

Jason Fyk Joins To Discuss His Case Against Section 230 and The Federal Government

Alec Flores 0
https://frankspeech.com/tv/video/jason-fyk-joins-discuss-his-case-against-section-230-and-federal-government Section 230 and The GovernmentJason Fyk joins Brannon Howse on the Lindell Report. Jason was a social media ...
April 27, 2022
APRIL 27, 2022 ? LIVE FROM DC! ? FYK vs THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. SECTION 230 IS ABOUT TO ?

APRIL 27, 2022 ? LIVE FROM DC! ? FYK vs THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. SECTION 230 IS ABOUT TO ?

Alec Flores 0
https://rumble.com/embed/v101ucl/?pub=4
March 7, 2022
Big Tech in Trouble? The Lawsuit That May Bring Them Down.

Big Tech in Trouble? The Lawsuit That May Bring Them Down.

Alec Flores 0
https://youtu.be/7Fqgx4Xoj1A
March 3, 2022
Former Content Creator Sues Facebook Advocates For Free Speech Online

Former Content Creator Sues Facebook Advocates For Free Speech Online

Alec Flores 0
https://www.ntd.com/former-content-creator-sues-facebook-advocates-for-free-speech-online_747591.html

Posts navigation

1 … 4 5 6 … 8

Recent Posts

  • The END Of Censorship, SCOTUS Ruling Could END Section 230 Censorship Of Conservatives From Big Tech
  • Man VS Meta: Jason Fyk’s War for Free Speech and His Battle Against Meta
  • Laura Loomer Interviews Jason Fyk
  • Mel K & Jason Fyk | Government Censorship Cartel Exposes Itself | 1-16-25
  • EXCLUSIVE WITH TIM POOL:

Categories

  • Articles
  • Audio Discussions
  • Interviews
  • Podcast
  • Section 230
  • Twitter Spaces
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

“Freedom of expression does not end where the internet begins.”
– Social Media Freedom Foundation 

• Home • Posts  • Articles • Interviews • Filings

• About Us • Members • Donate

• Contact • Media Inquiries • Submit Your Story

Social Media Freedom Foundation Corp. Is a 501c3 Non Profit | Est. 2021
Privacy Policy