MENU
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Email [email protected]
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
donate now
June 17, 2021
Section 230 of the CDA Is Anything but Settled Law

Section 230 of the CDA Is Anything but Settled Law

Jason Fyk 0
Many would have you believe that Section 230 is “settled law”, especially the “tech oligarchs” and their ...
May 5, 2021
230’s “Intelligible Principle”

230’s “Intelligible Principle”

Jason Fyk 0
The “Good Samaritan” provision. “Good Samaritan” Snapchat created a speed filter which rewarded a user with new filters based ...
May 5, 2021
Chipping Away At Big Tech’s Section 230 Protections, Jason Fyk Is Going Back After Facebook

Chipping Away At Big Tech’s Section 230 Protections, Jason Fyk Is Going Back After Facebook

Jason Fyk 0
Fyk is encouraged by the most recent ruling by the 9th Circuit Court, which causes a conflict ...
April 29, 2021
Does Section 230 Provide Different Immunity for Facebook Rather than Malwarebytes?

Does Section 230 Provide Different Immunity for Facebook Rather than Malwarebytes?

Jason Fyk 0
Two diametrically opposed 9th Circuit decisions that can neither coexist nor be lawfully reconciled. Most, if not almost ...
April 29, 2021
Barnes V. Yahoo! Inc. Immunity Test Correction

Barnes V. Yahoo! Inc. Immunity Test Correction

Jason Fyk 0
Courts have often applied a three-part legal test which originated in Barnes vs. Yahoo. The test was ...
April 15, 2021
(FYK-S)ection 230

(FYK-S)ection 230

Jason Fyk 0
proposed “proper” CDA amendment Section 230 is not necessarily broken. The Section 230 is far too vague, it ...
March 6, 2021
Stew Peters Show | Lawsuit!? Facebook Has Met Its Match! It’s Time To Reform Section 230

Stew Peters Show | Lawsuit!? Facebook Has Met Its Match! It’s Time To Reform Section 230

Jason Fyk 0
Jason Fyk is a Social Media Freedom Advocate and a Section 230 expert who is currently all-in ...
December 15, 2020
Ryan Hartwig with Project Veritas speaks in Phoenix

Ryan Hartwig with Project Veritas speaks in Phoenix

Jason Fyk 0
https://youtu.be/-Z9JWlyG3YY
November 24, 2020
Callagy Law Files Petition With The U.S. Supreme Court Seeking To Overturn Big Tech’s Blanket Immunity Rights

Callagy Law Files Petition With The U.S. Supreme Court Seeking To Overturn Big Tech’s Blanket Immunity Rights

Jason Fyk 0
Fyk v. Facebook Challenges Subsection 230 of the Communications Decency Act https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/callagy-law-files-petition-with-the-u-s-supreme-court-seeking-to-overturn-big-techs-blanket-immunity-rights/
October 27, 2020
David Harris Jr. Exclusive Interview with Jason Fyk!

David Harris Jr. Exclusive Interview with Jason Fyk!

Jason Fyk 0
clusive! David Harris Jr. sits down with Jason Fyk, the man that’s about to stop big tech ...

Posts navigation

1 … 6 7 8

Recent Posts

  • The END Of Censorship, SCOTUS Ruling Could END Section 230 Censorship Of Conservatives From Big Tech
  • Man VS Meta: Jason Fyk’s War for Free Speech and His Battle Against Meta
  • Laura Loomer Interviews Jason Fyk
  • Mel K & Jason Fyk | Government Censorship Cartel Exposes Itself | 1-16-25
  • EXCLUSIVE WITH TIM POOL:

Categories

  • Articles
  • Audio Discussions
  • Interviews
  • Podcast
  • Section 230
  • Twitter Spaces
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

“Freedom of expression does not end where the internet begins.”
– Social Media Freedom Foundation 

• Home • Posts  • Articles • Interviews • Filings

• About Us • Members • Donate

• Contact • Media Inquiries • Submit Your Story

Social Media Freedom Foundation Corp. Is a 501c3 Non Profit | Est. 2021
Privacy Policy