MENU
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Email [email protected]
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
      • 48. DE 32.1 3.3.25 Filed Motion to Recall Mandate
      • 49. DE 33.1 3.4.25 Order Denying Motion To Recall Mandate
      • 50. Petition to SCOTUS 3
      • 51. Petition to SCOTUS 3 (full appendix)
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
donate now
October 15, 2020
Section 230 — “a” Decision That Could Change “the” Social Media World

Section 230 — “a” Decision That Could Change “the” Social Media World

Jason Fyk 0
Justice Thomas welcomed an appropriate case to properly interpret the CDA section 230, and my case should be that ...
June 26, 2020
Steel Truth Media | Juanita Broaddrick, Jason Fyk & Mike Smith

Steel Truth Media | Juanita Broaddrick, Jason Fyk & Mike Smith

Jason Fyk 0
WATCH HERE: https://www.steeltruth.com/?wix-vod-video-id=7fbf854e9b484b48a0102051bcd99dfe&wix-vod-comp-id=comp-kl5lh1zq
October 11, 2019

AMPFest 2019

Alec Flores 0
https://youtu.be/0NvSC_V5QXs
June 6, 2019
OAN | Facebook Unfair ‘AdShielding’ Practice Exposed

OAN | Facebook Unfair ‘AdShielding’ Practice Exposed

Jason Fyk 0
A new report is shedding light on an unfair and illegal business practice called AdShielding, which Facebook ...
August 27, 2018
Diamond and Silk “ChitChat Live”

Diamond and Silk “ChitChat Live”

Jason Fyk 0
Jason Fyk joins Diamond and Silk for #ChitChatLive | August 27, 2018
August 24, 2018
Callagy Law | FACEBOOK FACE-OFF: Pennsylvania Entrepreneur Suing Facebook For Destroying His Business

Callagy Law | FACEBOOK FACE-OFF: Pennsylvania Entrepreneur Suing Facebook For Destroying His Business

Jason Fyk 0
“Facebook is unlawfully silencing people (including Fyk) for its own financial gain…Facebook is not above the law ...
August 24, 2018
Big League Politics | ZUCK SUED: Entrepreneur Strikes Back At Facebook After Humor Page Was BANNED

Big League Politics | ZUCK SUED: Entrepreneur Strikes Back At Facebook After Humor Page Was BANNED

Jason Fyk 0
“As I announced this morning on Fox and Friends, I am bringing a lawsuit against Facebook in ...
August 5, 2018
Fox & Friends

Fox & Friends

Jason Fyk 0
Businessman sues Facebook for censorship, claiming the social media giant devalued his pages for monetary gain. Your ...

Posts navigation

1 … 7 8

Recent Posts

  • The END Of Censorship, SCOTUS Ruling Could END Section 230 Censorship Of Conservatives From Big Tech
  • Man VS Meta: Jason Fyk’s War for Free Speech and His Battle Against Meta
  • Laura Loomer Interviews Jason Fyk
  • Mel K & Jason Fyk | Government Censorship Cartel Exposes Itself | 1-16-25
  • EXCLUSIVE WITH TIM POOL:

Categories

  • Articles
  • Audio Discussions
  • Interviews
  • Podcast
  • Section 230
  • Twitter Spaces
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

“Freedom of expression does not end where the internet begins.”
– Social Media Freedom Foundation 

• Home • Posts  • Articles • Interviews • Filings

• About Us • Members • Donate

• Contact • Media Inquiries • Submit Your Story

Social Media Freedom Foundation Corp. Is a 501c3 Non Profit | Est. 2021
Privacy Policy