MENU
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Fyk V FB Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Fyk v FB Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Social Media Freedom Foundation
Email [email protected]
  • Home
  • Media
    • Articles
    • Interviews
  • Documents
    • Fyk vs. Facebook
      • 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
      • 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
      • 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
      • 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
      • 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
      • 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
      • 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
      • 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook II
      • 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
      • 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to Motion 60(b)
      • 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion 60(b)
      • 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
      • 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
      • 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
      • 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
      • 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
      • 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
      • 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
      • 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
      • 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
      • 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
      • 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
      • 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
      • 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
    • Fyk Vs. Facebook III
      • 28.Second 60(b) Motion for Relief
      • 29. Facebook’s Second 60(b) Response to Motion
      • 31. Order of Recusal
      • 30. Fyk Second 60(b) Reply
      • 32. Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge
      • 33. DOJ’s Notice of Appearance
      • 34. DOJ’s Acknowlegment of Constitutional Challenge
      • 35. Facebook’s Response to Fyk’s Rule 5.1
      • 36. Fyk’s Response to DOJ
      • 37. Fyk’s Reply to Facebook’s 5.1 Response
      • 38. Notice of Supplemental Authority
      • 38.5 Dangaard Deciscion
      • 39. District Court Second Motion 60(b) Denial
      • 40. 9th Circuit Opening Brief (3)
      • 41. Facebook’s 9th Circuit Reply Brief
      • 42. Fyks 9th Circuit Response Brief
      • 43. Anderson v Tik Tok supp
      • 44. RNC & Doe Supplemental Authority Filing
      • 45. 9th Circuit Memorandum Dismissal
      • 46. Fyk V FB Petition For Rehearing En Banc
      • 47. Fyk v FB Supplemental Filing A.B. v Salesforce
    • Section 230 for DUMMIES
    • Justice Thomas
      • (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
      • (Doe vs. Facebook)
    • Fyk Vs. United States of America
      • 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
      • 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
      • 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
      • 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
      • 5. Fyk Vs United States Ddc Memorandum Opinion Dismissing Fyk
    • Online Freedom Act
    • Override Forum Selection Act
    • Brighteon v. USA / Big Tech
      • 1. Brighteon – DE 1 Complaint
      • 2. Brighteon – [DE 37] Google Motion To Transfer
      • 3. Brighteon – [DE 38] FB Motion To Transfer
      • 4. Brighteon – [DE 39] 𝕏 Motion To Transfer
      • 5. Brighteon – [DE 49] Filed Response To Motions To Transfer
    • Bollingers v. Censorship Industrial Complex
  • Maxims
    • General Maxims
    • Supreme Court Maxims
  • About
    • Members
    • Submit Your Story
  • Donate
  • Contact
    • Media Inquiries
donate now
November 28, 2022
4th Circuit Drops Bomb on Big Tech and What It Could Mean for Section 230. ft. Anna Khait

4th Circuit Drops Bomb on Big Tech and What It Could Mean for Section 230. ft. Anna Khait

Alec Flores 0
https://twitter.com/Annakhait/status/1597379946313551872?t=x3OAYGLZusvifqPEvRXlfA&s=19
November 22, 2022
Capitol Report: Section 230 Could Go To Supreme Court

Capitol Report: Section 230 Could Go To Supreme Court

Alec Flores 0
https://twitter.com/capitolreport/status/1595072978521411587?t=xoLKZ9KVRqkX91GGsszuFw&s=19
November 18, 2022
Federal Court Determines Section 230 ‘Is Not License To Do Whatever One Wants Online’

Federal Court Determines Section 230 ‘Is Not License To Do Whatever One Wants Online’

Alec Flores 0
The article discusses a recent decision by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Section 230 of ...
November 14, 2022
Platforms, Publishers, Constitutional Challenges and the biggest case in America

Platforms, Publishers, Constitutional Challenges and the biggest case in America

Alec Flores 0
https://rumble.com/embed/v1rv3i0/?pub=4
October 20, 2022
Fighting For Freedom with Reggie Littlejohn and Jason Fyk | MSOM Ep. 604

Fighting For Freedom with Reggie Littlejohn and Jason Fyk | MSOM Ep. 604

Alec Flores 0
https://rumble.com/embed/v1mc8qs/?pub=4 Watch The Full Video on Rumble: In this episode of MSOM, Sean Morgan interviews Reggie Littlejohn about ...
October 12, 2022
JASON FYK: Publisher vs Platform– Section 230’s ‘As Applied’ Problem

JASON FYK: Publisher vs Platform– Section 230’s ‘As Applied’ Problem

Alec Flores 0
The article by Jason Fyk discusses the complexities of Section 230, focusing on the legal distinctions between ...
September 30, 2022
US government struggles to protect Section 230 against first-ever lawsuit

US government struggles to protect Section 230 against first-ever lawsuit

Alec Flores 0
https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/us-government-struggles-to-protect-section-230-against-first-ever-lawsuit/preview
September 27, 2022
Mel K & Free Speech Warrior Jason Fyk On Section 230, Saving Free Speech & The Constitution 9-27-22

Mel K & Free Speech Warrior Jason Fyk On Section 230, Saving Free Speech & The Constitution 9-27-22

Alec Flores 0
https://rumble.com/embed/v1hzjm3/?pub=8eibt
September 21, 2022
SUE the Censorious Big Tech Social Media Platforms! Episode 37 W/ Jason Fyk

SUE the Censorious Big Tech Social Media Platforms! Episode 37 W/ Jason Fyk

Alec Flores 0
https://rumble.com/embed/v1ie1bz/?pub=8eibt
September 14, 2022
US Government Scrambling to Dodge First Constitutional Challenge of Section 230

US Government Scrambling to Dodge First Constitutional Challenge of Section 230

Alec Flores 0
https://humanevents.com/2022/09/14/us-government-scrambling-to-dodge-first-constitutional-challenge-of-section-230

Posts navigation

1 … 3 4 5 … 8

Recent Posts

  • Man VS Meta: Jason Fyk’s War for Free Speech and His Battle Against Meta
  • Laura Loomer Interviews Jason Fyk
  • Mel K & Jason Fyk | Government Censorship Cartel Exposes Itself | 1-16-25
  • EXCLUSIVE WITH TIM POOL:
  • 🔥 Free Speech Under Fire: Jason Fyk’s Fight Against Big Tech Censorship 🔥

Categories

  • Articles
  • Audio Discussions
  • Interviews
  • Podcast
  • Section 230
  • Twitter Spaces
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

“Freedom of expression does not end where the internet begins.”
– Social Media Freedom Foundation 

• Home • Posts  • Articles • Interviews • Filings

• About Us • Members • Donate

• Contact • Media Inquiries • Submit Your Story

Social Media Freedom Foundation Corp. Is a 501c3 Non Profit | Est. 2021
Privacy Policy